Published on Wednesday, January 9th, 2008 by Jeff Parks under
Community.
My good friend Chris Pierre from Glencastle Security, was kind enough to send me this article he came across on the networkedgovernment.ca website.
Anthony D. Williams, co-author of the best selling book, Wikinomics, discusses many of the issues I’ve blogged about in the past including the impact of the Baby Boomers retiring and how the next generation, the iGeneration, will play a key role in shaping our future. As well as how the old school of leadership needs to be replaced by a bottom-up approach for all projects.
Already, millions of people have joined forces in self-organized collaborations that have produced dynamic innovations in goods and services rivaling the world’s largest and best-financed enterprise networks. If masses of ordinary people can peer-produce an operating system (Linux), an encyclopedia (Wikipedia), the media (YouTube/Current TV), a mutual fund, and even a physical thing such as a motorcycle, one should carefully consider what might come next.
Many in the Government are concerned about security. This includes the risk of creating a community of open collaboration on projects; sharing content across the country with other departments; and the concern of receiving feedback that is less than excellent about ideas posted or policies in place.
I appreciate this concern. Though I don’t believe it has merit; and here’s why…
Regardless of corporate policy, many of the iGeneration are using Blogs and Wikis to communicate ideas and share information on projects within the Federal Government. No one is doing this to be malicious. This is simply the way they know how to communicate best and project manage efficiently.
In other words, it’s what and how Canadians are expecting their Government to communicate with them.
Drawing on their experience on sites such as Facebook and YouTube, young government professionals have organized their own ad hoc communities that transcend departmental and organizational boundaries using blogs, wikis, and social networking tools. More often than not, their enterprising, under-the-radar efforts have been stamped out by senior managers who cite as justification concerns about data security, legal constraints, or fears that sensitive information could leak out to the public.
The seemingly paranoid state of the world today has created silos between departments, and what’s worse, barriers between people on teams that are supposed to be working together. Mix in a healthy dose of politics and you’ve created a corporate culture whereby people are afraid to share ideas and collaborate both on line and off line.
In spite of this, what I see in our Government is unlimited potential. We live in the greatest country on earth – bar none. We have access to the world’s most beautiful natural resources; as well as unlimited potential with our people both in terms of innovation and creativity.
What frustrates me the most is when I see this potential in people quashed by something as trivial as politics. (This applies to all sectors, including private and non-profit.) We have the ability, knowledge, and capacity to act. The only question remains is will we?
Aaron Wildavsky was quoted as saying “No Risk is the Highest Risk.” I concur.
I believe this discussion merits further debate at every level of Government and it would be my pleasure to engage anyone in the public sector who would like to discuss ideas and challenges being brought forward in this age of community and collaboration.
It is truly a time when either government plays an active and positive role in its own transformation, or change will happen to it. The transformation process is at the same time exhilarating and painful, but the price of inaction is a lost opportunity for government to redefine its role in a new golden age of democracy.